A REVIEW ON HPLC APPROACHES FOR SIMULTANEOUSLY DETERMINING ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUG COMBINATIONS

Pramod Kumar Goyal; Manish Jaimini

doi:10.61280/tjpls.v8i6.105

Pramod Kumar Goyal Research Scholar, Department of Pharmacy, Maharishi Arvind University, Jaipur
Manish Jaimini Professor & HOD, Department of Pharmacy, Maharishi Arvind University, Jaipur

DOI: https://doi.org/10.61280/tjpls.v8i6.105

Keywords:

Simultaneous analysis, RP-HPLC method, Antihypertensive dosage form, Validation parameters

Abstract

Recent demand for high-throughput analyses with high sensitivity and selectivity to molecules and drugs in different classes with different physical-chemical properties and a reduction in analysis time is a major milestone for novel methodologies, especially when analytical procedures are applied to clinical purposes. Multi-drug therapy are used to treat multiple diseases to prevent high doses of a single medicine that could produce negative effects. In recent years, fast approaches for analysing mixed compounds have been in high demand. New procedures and devices were created to meet these needs. Complex matrices can slow sample preparation and processing. Quantitative drug association profiles face issues with components, matrices, compounds, and physical-chemical complexity. We discuss HPLC methods for the determination of different combination of Benidipine hydrochloride, Metoprolol succinate, Azelnidipine, Bisoprolol Fumarate, and Cilnidipine. This study covers recently optimised procedures such as chromatographic separation, as well as methodologies that have improved accuracy, sensitivity, and selectivity in quantitative drug association analyses.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Nováková L, Solich P, Solichová D. HPLC methods for simultaneous determination of ascorbic and dehydroascorbic acids. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2008; 27:942–958

Abd El-Hay SS, el Sheikh R, Gouda AA, et al. Simultaneous estimation of pantoprazole and piroxicam by HPLC: Response surface methodology approach. Microchemical Journal 2022; 176:10–24

Geetha G, Vignesh Kumar B, Gnana Raja M. Analytical Method Validation: an Updated Review. International Journal Of Advances in Pharmacy, Biology and Chemistry 2012; 1:

Shah BP, Jain S, Prajapati KK, et al. Stability indicating HPLC method development: A Review. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2012; 3:2978–2988

Paithankar H v. HPLC Method Validation for Pharmaceuticals: A Review. International Journal of Universal Pharmacy and Bio Sciences 2013; 2:229–240

Bharti Mittu AC, Chauhan P. Analytical Method Development and Validation: A Concise Review. J Anal Bioanal Tech 2015; 06:

. A Review of: Analytical Method Development and Validation. J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol 1998; 21:

Kothari S, Tiwari N, Patani P. A Review on HPLC Method Development and Validation. J Emerg Technol Innov Res 2019; 6:1195–1203

. Benidipine hydrochloride | C28H32ClN3O6 - PubChem.

. Benidipine hydrochloride | DrugBank Online.

. Metoprolol succinate | DrugBank Online.

. Metoprolol | C15H25NO3 - PubChem.

. Azelnidipine | C33H34N4O6 - PubChem.

. 123524-52-7 | Azelnidipine | C₃₃H₃₄N₄O₆ | TRC.

. Bisoprolol fumarate | C22H35NO8 - PubChem.

. Cilnidipine | C27H28N2O7 - PubChem.

Commission. Indian Pharmacopoeia, 2018 - Metoprolol. 2018; II:2583–2584

Commission. Indian Pharmacopoeia, 2018 - Azelnidipine. 2018; II:1304–1305

Commission. Indian Pharmacopoeia, 2018 - Bisoprolol fumarate. 2018; II:1392–1393

Commission. Indian Pharmacopoeia, 2018 - Cilnidipine. 2018; II:1616–1617

Bellur Atici E, Karliʇa B. Identification, synthesis and characterization of process related impurities of benidipine hydrochloride, stress-testing/stability studies and HPLC/UPLC method validations. J Pharm Anal 2015; 5:256–268

Patel DM, Patel D, Patel A, et al. Method Development and Validation for Simultaneous Estimation of Benidipine Hydrochloride and Metoprolol Succinate in Tablet. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics 2019; 9:28–33

Balaji Gupta Tiruveedhi VLN, Battula VR, Bonige KB. Novel determination of anti-hypertensive combination; benidipine hydrochloride and nebivolol hydrochloride by high performance chromatographic method. Res J Pharm Technol 2021; 14:5433–5438

Naim M, Ahmed A. Stability indicating reverse-phase high- performance liquid chromatography method development and validation for simultaneous estimation of telmisartan and benidipine hydrochloride in pharmaceutical dosage form. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research 2018; 11:342–350

Aqil M, Ali A, Ahad A, et al. A validated HPLC method for estimation of metoprolol in human plasma. Acta Chromatogr 2007; 19:130–140

Chitlange SS, Imran M, Sakarkar DM. RP-HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of amlodipine and metoprolol in tablet formulation. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutics (AJP) 2008; 2:232–234

Dongre VG, Shah SB, Karmuse PP, et al. Simultaneous determination of metoprolol succinate and amlodipine besylate in pharmaceutical dosage form by HPLC. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2008; 46:583–586

Baranowska I, Wilczek A. Simultaneous RP-HPLC determination of sotalol, metoprolol, α-hydroxymetoprolol, paracetamol and its glucuronide and sulfate metabolites in human urine. Analytical Sciences 2009; 25:769–772

Morante‐Zarcero S, Sierra I. Simultaneous enantiomeric determination of propranolol, metoprolol, pindolol, and atenolol in natural waters by HPLC on new polysaccharide‐based stationary phase using a highly selective molecularly imprinted polymer extraction. Chirality 2012; 24:860–866

Kanthale SB, Thonte SS, Mahapatra DK. Stability indicating RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation of ivabradine and metoprolol in bulk and tablet formulation. J Appl Pharm Sci 2019; 9:137–144

Phale MD, Hamrapurkar PD. A validated and simplified RP-HPLC of metoprolol succinate from bulk drugs. Asian J Res Chem 2009; 2:119–122

Bhosale AP, Pingle AP. Bioanalytical RP-HPLC method development and validation for estimation of azelnidipine and Olmesartan medoxomil in human plasma.

Modi J, Patel SK, Parikh N, et al. Stability indicating analytical method development and validation for estimation of azelnidipine. World J Pharm Res 2016; 5:831–847

Kumar M, Chandra U, Garg A, et al. Development and Validation of In-vitro dissolution test using RP-HPLC Analysis for simultaneous estimation of Azelnidipine and Telmisartan in a Fixed-dose Combination. Res J Pharm Technol 2022; 15:1967–1972

Chaitanya DB, Ajitha M. Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Method Development and Validation for simultaneous estimation of Azelnidipine and Telmisartan in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Dosage Form: https://doi. org/10.54037/WJPS. 2022.100113. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2022; 121–127

Muralidharan S, Parasuraman S, Venugopal V. Simple validation of Azelnidipine by RP-HPLC Method. Rapports De Pharmacie 2015; 1:43–45

Patel JK, Patel NK. Validated stability-indicating RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous determination of azelnidipine and olmesartan in their combined dosage form. Sci Pharm 2014; 82:541–554

Patel KH, Mahida RJ. A review on analytical methods for estimation of azelnidipine and telmisartan in pharmaceutical dosage form. 2021;

Logoyda L, Kovalenko S, Abdel-Megied AM, et al. HPLC method development for the analysis of bisoprolol in combined dosage form containing bisoprolol and enalapril and in vitro dissolution studied. International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics 2019; 11:186–194

Mostafa A. Simultaneous Spectrophotometric Estimation of Bisoprolol Fumarate and Hydrochlorothiazide in Tablet Formulation using Partial Least-Squares, Principal Component Regression Multivariate Calibrations and RP-HPLC Methods. J Anal Pharm Res 2017; 4:1–9

Kondratova Y, Logoyda L, Voloshko Y, et al. Development and validation of HPLC-dad method for the determination of bisoprolol in tablet dosage forms. International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics 2017; 9:54–59

Ulu ST, Aydoǧmuş Z. An HPLC method for the determination of bisoprolol in human plasma and its application to a pharmacokinetic study. J Chromatogr Sci 2012; 50:615–619

Logoyda L. Efficient validated method of HPLC to determine amlodipine in combinated dosage form containing amlodipine, enalapril and bisoprolol and in vitro dissolution studies with in vitro/in vivo correlation. Pharmacia 2020; 67:55–61

Patel H, Damahe DP, Narkhede SB. RP-HPLC Method Development and Validation for Simultaneous Estimation of Cilnidipine and Bisoprolol Fumarate in Tablet Dosage Form. Int J Chemtech Res 2019; 12:269–276

Logoyda L. Efficient validated method of HPLC to determine enalapril in a combined dosage form containing enalapril and bisoprolol and in vitro dissolution studies. International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics 2019; 11:19–24

Tiwari B, Shirsat MK, Kulkarni A. Development and validation of stability indicating RP-HPLC method for estimation of Cilnidipine. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics 2020; 10:97–100

Sankar PR, Babu S, Ravi P. Development and Validation Of Novel UV And RP-HPLC Methods For Determination Of Cilnidipine (A New Generation Ca Channel Blocker) In Pharmaceutical Dosage Form. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2019; 10:1886–1894

Rupareliya RH, Joshi HS. Stability Indicating Simultaneous Validation of Telmisartan and Cilnidipine with Forced Degradation Behavior Study by RP-HPLC in Tablet Dosage Form. Int Sch Res Notices 2013; 2013:

Kudumula N, Prasad YR. Development and validation of RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation of chlorthalidone and cilnidipine in bulk and combined tablet dosage form. Pharmacophore 2014; 5:442–450

Kachave R, Kale M, Wagh R. Simultaneous estimation of Cilnidipine and Valsartan by RP-HPLC in tablet formulation. Eurasian J. Anal. Chem 2016; 11:245–253

Sunitha N, Mariha SC, Venu A, et al. Method Development and Validation of RP-HPLC Method for the Simultaneous Estimation of Olmesartan and Cilnidipine in Bulk and Formulations. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research & Allied Sciences 2015; 4:

Sidhdhapara Mital J, Patel B, Paramar A. Development and validation of RP-HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of Cilnidipine and Olmesartan medoxomil in their combined tablet dosage form. Int J Pharm Biosci 2014; 4:157–160